Friday, November 30, 2007

NYC -- Development Uber Alles!

[I was startled to discover that a number of my favorite stores and others ranging from B'way east down 125th St. have had their leases closed down since my last shopping trip to C-Town and the stores around it. The closed ones include the neighborhood pharmacy, a 99 cent store, a shoe store, the Laundromat where one could wait for a bus in bad weather. So far as I can determine these properties are owned by the city which is upgrading (?) -- the new Commerce Bank. Sadly this was the shopping center for Grant Houses and other nearby residents.

What we are seeing is a collaborative effort on the part of the Bloomberg administration to make big bucks both from its city owned properties and also as sponsor of such efforts as the Columbia extension into Manhattanville. The articles from today's Spectator (below) tell it all as members of the city's LDC (Local Development Corporation) set up by Bloomberg & Co. to negotiate with the residents and businesses under the Columbia gun has been corrupted by local pols from top to bottom (with the notable exception of Bill Perkins) who are more than ready to go along -- Charlie Rangel, Scott Stringer, Eric Schneiderman, Robert Jackson, and others. They have preempted the decision-making by Community Board #9 with covert negotiations by a small contingent of their leaders -- does not bode well for the communities under fire now.

Super gentrification has now replaced affordable housing as a NYC model for making places for people where they and their children can prosper. Robert A. Taft, former Republican majority leader and presidential candidate in the Eisenhower era, who was converted to public housing as the only way to provide affordable living, would turn over in his grave. Bloomberg is an operator -- typical of the billionaires who have taken over American democracy in the interest of themselves and their cronies -- and then there is the crookery of Giuliani now emerging into public consciousness. Some party! Ed Kent]

.................................

Three Members Resign From LDC
By Daniel Amzallag
PUBLISHED NOVEMBER 29, 2007

Three members of the West Harlem Local Development Corporation announced their resignation Wednesday night, citing a lack of progress and corruption among local elected officials.

The resignation of Tom DeMott, CC ’80, Nick Sprayregen, and Luisa Henriquez—who have all been outspoken activists against Columbia’s proposed Manhattanville expansion—from the LDC, a non-profit organization created to develop a community benefits agreement with Columbia, comes days after a City Planning Commission decision approving the expansion’s rezoning plan. The plan must now be approved by the New York City Council, as part of the city’s Uniform Land Use Review Procedure.

“I feel that I cannot be part of a group that is negotiating with Columbia in a way that does not truly represent the wishes of those whom we represent,” said Sprayregen, who is also the largest private property owner after Columbia in the expansion footprint. “We have tried from the inside to steer things right, but we have been unable to do so. Now perhaps from the outside we can draw more attention to how corrupt this has become.”

Susan Russell, an officer of the LDC and chief of staff for City Council member Robert Jackson, D-West Harlem, expressed surprise and disappointment with the resignations. “They’re trying to make us look bad to make their point, but the fact is this local development corporation is a very excellent and hardworking body. We’re completing our mission to so many people,” she said.

“People always have different opinions about what’s in the best interests of the community, but for them to be disparaging this body ... is very unfortunate, and they are using this for their own political ends,” she added.

Henriquez, a resident of the expansion zone, cited a lack of transparency in the LDC as the reason for her resignation. “They are showing one thing in the meeting, we see one thing, and we hear other things,” she said. “They’re supposed to make meetings with the public, make a forum, and let the community know what’s going on. They haven’t done that, and they’re supposed to.”

Russell, who led an effort to oust Sprayregen from the board this summer, defended the practice of involving a limited number of people in negotiations. “It’s not like people are trying to exclude others, but there has to be a certain level of practicality there,” she said. “Everyone on that board is absolutely dedicated to this community, and I can say that without hesitation.”

DeMott, of the Coalition to Preserve Community, and Sprayregen pointed to problems they described with elected officials who serve on the LDC. Politicians have been working to “streamline” approval of rezoning regardless of effects to the community, DeMott said. “They were basically more interested in being friends of Columbia and big developers than they were in truly representing the community,” Sprayregen said.

Many of the elected officials on the board have conflicts of interest with the LDC’s objectives, Sprayregen said. He pointed to Jackson, whom Russell represents on the LDC, who as a council member has decision-making power over ULURP. “He’s serving two masters. You just can’t do it. It’s not right, it’s not ethical, and it doesn’t make sense,” Sprayregen said. Sprayregen also cited conflicts of interest concerning Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, who in September endorsed Columbia’s plan after the University committed $20 million toward affordable housing and $11.25 million for the upkeep of the West Harlem Waterfront Park.

But the LDC consulted the City Council, the city’s conflict of interest board, and the counsels of numerous politicians before forming, and was declared appropriate because of its advisory function, Russell said. “We’ve done all the right things, we’ve taken all the appropriate steps. We’re about following rules, it’s what we do,” she said.

DeMott said he now aims to lobby the City Council to reject Columbia’s expansion plan in addition to urging Columbia donors not to give funds for the expansion. “We are very firm and clear in our conviction that we’re going to stop this plan where it comes. We’ll be out in front of the bulldozers, but before that happens, we will make sure that those who are thinking of contributing to this expansion plan will have second thoughts,” he said.

Columbia spokeswoman La-Verna Fountain declined to comment.

“We’re working hard. We really need to stay focused on our work,” Russell said. “I don’t believe that I in my work or the rest of the board for that matter can be distracted [by the resignations] in whatever we’re trying to accomplish.”

Daniel Amzallag can be reached at news@columbiaspectator.com.
TAGS: Manhattanville, Nick Sprayregen, Tom DeMott

.............................

Ex-LDC Members Rally at City Hall
By Dan Amzallag
PUBLISHED NOVEMBER 30, 2007

Members and supporters of the Coalition to Preserve Community rallied at City Hall Thursday to protest practices of the West Harlem Local Development Corporation regarding Columbia’s proposed expansion into Manhattanville.

The press conference followed the resignations of Tom DeMott, CC ’80, Luisa Henriques, and Nick Sprayregen from the LDC, a nonprofit organization created to develop a community benefits agreement with Columbia regarding the expansion.

DeMott and Sprayregen criticized what they described as secrecy in the LDC’s dealings. LDC Board members are unable to report what occurs in closed negotiation sessions as part of a “gag order,” DeMott said. “Unfortunately, side deals are happening all over the place, and many members of committees aren’t even aware about the negotiating that’s going on,” said Cynthia Doty, a member of the Coalition to Preserve Community.

But LDC member Maritta Dunn argued that negotiations necessitate closed meetings. “Inside the LDC, information has always been shared, so I don’t know what more anyone can ask for. Each member is responsible to report back to the constituency that we represent,” she said.

“The WHLDC has held open forums, convened public sessions of its weekly general meetings and included many community members in its working groups to ensure that the public is kept informed and community feedback is obtained,” said a LDC statement released on Thursday.

Nearly all the rally’s speakers condemned Columbia’s threat to use eminent domain, which Dunn said “the community in total has been against.”

“At a minimum the City Council should say to Columbia, ‘Your current plan will be rejected unless you tell us at a minimum no eminent domain,” said Norman Siegel, a civil rights attorney representing businesses in the expansion footprint. “No business, no resident should ever be displaced in order to vie the property to a private entity.”

“It’s an absolute disgrace that we are abusing the eminent domain process, which is supposed to be to take people’s property under the very best of reasons,” City Council Member Tony Avella, D-Queens, said after the press conference. “But to take it to give to a developer to make millions upon millions of dollars is unconscionable, unconstitutional, and disgraceful.”
The University has said that it hopes to accomplish its expansion without the use of eminent domain, but is unwilling to take it off the table.
Speakers at the rally emphasized their dismay with local elected officials, a grievance which DeMott and Sprayregen have cited as a reason for their resignations. “What was started as a board strictly of members of the community was transformed into one that included representatives from every politician that could get their hands into it,” said Sprayregen, who is second largest private property owner in the expansion footprint after Columbia. “The political representatives have effectively co-opted the board.”
Elected officials currently make up nine out of 28 members of the LDC.

“We’ve assured them [local elected officials] that they will not be able to dodge this issue—it will stick to them like Teflon,” Nellie Bailey, president of the Harlem Tenants Council, said. “They will become the Columbia University Teflon kings and queens of this expansion.”

But local politicians on the LDC are necessary to enforce its ultimate decision, Dunn said. “The politicians that are on the LDC are the politicians elected by the local community. We elected them to represent us—they didn’t come from outer space,” she said. “Most of the politicians have been reelected several terms, and if they’re new it’s because of term limits, not because of poor performance.”
Dan Amzallag can be reached at news@columbiaspectator.com.
TAGS: Expansion, LDC, Manhattanville
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Parallels: Nazi Subversion of Weimar Republic with Bush's

[I heard a rather scary interview on npr yesterday with Naomi Wolf reporting on her most recent book, "The End of America: Letter of Warning To A Young Patriot."

In it she enumerates ten different fascist modes of attack on the Weimar Republic in the early 1930s which eventuated in the Nazi takeover, still as a minority party, under Hitler. Her list of ten characteristics of fascism directly parallels recent events perpetrated by the Bush administration.

Listen up! It may not happen here, but we had better get ourselves together to avoid more bad things. Ed Kent]

....................................

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2064157,00.html

Fascist America, in 10 easy steps


From Hitler to Pinochet and beyond, history shows there are certain steps that any would-be dictator must take to destroy constitutional freedoms. And, argues Naomi Wolf, George Bush and his administration seem to be taking them all

Tuesday April 24, 2007
The Guardian

Last autumn, there was a military coup in Thailand. The leaders of the coup took a number of steps, rather systematically, as if they had a shopping list. In a sense, they did. Within a matter of days, democracy had been closed down: the coup leaders declared martial law, sent armed soldiers into residential areas, took over radio and TV stations, issued restrictions on the press, tightened some limits on travel, and took certain activists into custody.

Article continues [at website]
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Monday, November 26, 2007

Why can’t Palestinian residents of Israel drive despite strict security checks?

[Good people wonder why Palestinians become enraged with their treatment by Israelis? Here is a small tip of the iceberg of what it means to be an occupied and subordinated people. In the U.S. the life conditions of native Americans living on reservations are notoriously self-destructive with alcoholism being a major killer there. Ed Kent]

....................................

00:04 , 11.19.07

Driver's License

Driver's license Photo: Archive



Let them drive

Why can’t Palestinian residents of Israel drive despite strict security checks?



http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3472829,00.html




Tali Nir



Imagine a father, and imagine a physically disabled son. Imagine the need for physiotherapy, hospitalization, and even just going to the local shopping mall. Imagine that you have to do all that without a driver’s license. This isn’t the case because the father doesn’t know how to drive, or because he is suffering from some kind of disability. It’s not even because his license expired, but rather, it’s because he’s a Palestinian Arab.



In Israel, where any tourist can get a driver’s license, Palestinians are not allowed to drive. This ban is relevant to thousands of Palestinians who are allowed to live in Israel because they are married of Israeli citizens. The reason for this ban is, as usual, security considerations.



Even if we’re able to barely understand the link between driving and security, as well as the more meaningful question of why being Palestinian is enough to designate one as a security threat, we must recall that a comprehensive solution to the security threat is already in place, even without revoking one’s license: All Palestinians married to Israelis undergo comprehensive security checks every six months as a condition for extending their resident permits. If intelligence information points to suspicions of a security threat by any of them (or their extended family,) the partner is removed from his or her family immediately and sent back to the territories. The security apparatus works all the time.



However, the security establishment is not satisfied with that. It views every driving Palestinian as dangerous. Nationality is the only criteria. The thorough security screening of those who were allowed to live here is insufficient. It appears they forget we’re dealing with people who must live, raise children, and who ultimately have plenty to lose even if they as much as think about making trouble.



Waiting for an ambulance
For example, take the Abu Kaled family from the town of Lod. The father, Nahil, who originated from the West Bank, has been married for 10 years now to Najia, an Israeli citizen. Ever since they got married they live in Lod, where they raise four children. The eldest, who is nine-years-old, suffers from a severe disability and is mentally handicapped. On occasion he needs urgent medical attention.



This is the case, for example, when he suffers an epileptic seizure in the middle of the night. But Nahil is not allowed to drive. This means waiting for an ambulance and paying for it every time his kid has an attack.



Najia talks about the terrible fear and sense of helplessness when her son suffers a seizure, the ambulance fails to show up, and there’s nothing they can do. Besides that, she and her children are deprived from having a normal life. As he’s unable to drive, Nahil cannot find a job. Without the ability to drive, he cannot take the kids anywhere, even though they really want to go on trips or to the swimming pool.



“Children are important for the State of Israel, isn’t it so?” she asks. “So why don’t they take care of my kids too?”



And this is indeed the question. Why? After all, as noted, Nahil undergoes a security check every six months. Besides that, the Licensing Authority can grant Palestinians driving permits on “special grounds.” One would think that this possibility would be utilized in humanitarian cases. However, in this story is doesn’t work like that.



In a hearing last week before the High Court of Justice it turned out that to this day, not even one special permit has been granted. Criteria for special grounds have never been defined.



Tali Nir is an attorney in the Association for Civil Rights in Israel
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

America's "Manifest Destiny"??

[It is sadly true, as the Archbishop notes here, that Americans have confused their depredations upon others with a divine mission -- our "Manifest Destiny." This seems to have been true from the earliest arrival of our British ancestors on native American soil when the former asserted their g-d given right to slaughter and despoil the latter in the name of a "New Israel":

http://gbgm-umc.org/UMW/Joshua/manifest.html


Guess we are still at it over there. I don''t buy the innocence of the Brits, however, from which we got out disposition to dominate and steal. Ed Kent]

.....................................................

THE Archbishop of Canterbury has said that the United States wields its power in a way that is worse than Britain during its imperial heyday.

Rowan Williams claimed that America’s attempt to intervene overseas by “clearing the decks” with a “quick burst of violent action” had led to “the worst of all worlds”.

In a wide-ranging interview with a British Muslim magazine, the Anglican leader linked criticism of the United States to one of his most pessimistic declarations about the state of western civilisation.

He said the crisis was caused not just by America’s actions but also by its misguided sense of its own mission. He poured scorn on the “chosen nation myth of America, meaning that what happens in America is very much at the heart of God’s purpose for humanity”.

Williams went beyond his previous critique of the conduct of the war on terror, saying the United States had lost the moral high ground since September 11. He urged it to launch a “generous and intelligent programme of aid directed to the societies that have been ravaged; a check on the economic exploitation of defeated territories; a demilitarisation of their presence”.

He went on to suggest that the West was fundamentally adrift: “Our modern western definition of humanity is clearly not working very well. There is something about western modernity which really does eat away at the soul.”

Williams suggested American leadership had broken down: “We have only one global hegemonic power. It is not accumulating territory: it is trying to accumulate influence and control. That’s not working.”

He contrasted it unfavourably with how the British Empire governed India. “It is one thing to take over a territory and then pour energy and resources into administering it and normalising it. Rightly or wrongly, that’s what the British Empire did — in India, for example.

“It is another thing to go in on the assumption that a quick burst of violent action will somehow clear the decks and that you can move on and other people will put it back together — Iraq, for example.”

In the interview in Emel, a Muslim lifestyle magazine, Williams makes only mild criticisms of the Islamic world. He said the Muslim world must acknowledge that its “political solutions were not the most impressive”.

He commends the Muslim practice of praying five times a day, which he says allows the remembrance of God to be “built in deeply in their daily rhythm”.

Only by recovering prophetic and objective modes of preaching, in faithfulness to the gospel of Christ crucified and in contradiction to society’s profane habits and priorities, can we truly challenge our dying culture and reveal to it its own possibilities for resurrection.

Alan E Lewis. “Between Cross and Resurrection. A Theology of Holy Saturday” Eerdmans 2001 p 377
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Saturday, November 24, 2007

Lost in a Sea of Debt

[Now that I am myself retired and feeling some of the aches and pains of aging, I am particularly conscious of the suffering which so many elderly people must now be feeling as their very homes are threatened with the mortgage and money crunches that are facing millions of Americans.

We do what we can to help out those facing such things with whom we have direct contact. A fine middle aged friend recently died after several years of great pain caused by the final stages of multiple sclerosis. Her husband had died young, leaving her the small pension of a deputy sheriff and only disability payments from Social Security, as she was not yet old enough to receive full benefits. She was suffering hunger with reductions in food stamps along with pain. She was struggling to maintain the mortgage on her home. Her death was a blessing. She should not have spent her last years experiencing such terrible anxiety!

Near by live two older women also struggling to survive. One suffers from debilitating emphysema now requiring oxygen. A son, recently, separated from his wife, has moved in to care for her. Next door in their two family house a woman nearing the end of her work life also struggles to survive on a low income (nursing home) job with her disabled husband now institutionalized.

The temperature in this North East Kingdom town is 18 degrees today and will not go above freezing where it will remain for the foreseeable future. Each party must maintain increased heating costs. They are both renters who need all the help that they can get. But their community is not wealthy and most residents of it are struggling to survive themselves. Children find it hard to find employment during or after high school and, thus, are often in trouble with drugs as a stimulus to petty crimes.

One can understand why people turn to religious organizations for assistance. All too often the American system makes no effective provision for those in need and non-profits, religious or otherwise, can no way pick up the slack.

I studied back when in Britain for two separate years and saw there a totally different pattern. Affordable housing was state constructed and funded (as it used to be in this country). Medical care was universal and free. There are now job problems for some and tensions between ethnic and class groups, but not the deep anxiety that so many American face as to whether they may be cast tomorrow onto the streets in this bitter weather which is currently 26 degrees in Manhattan where I live.Ed Kent]

.........................

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/24/opinion/24herbert.html?th&emc=th


Op-Ed Columnist
Lost in a Flood of Debt

By BOB HERBERT
Published: November 24, 2007

CHICAGO

I've been visiting some of the people who have been most affected by the subprime mortgage debacle. It’s a largely bewildered, frightened group that includes people like Dorothy Levey, a 79-year-old widow who sits alone inside the small house she has lived in for 41 years, afraid to answer the telephone or the door.

She has every reason to be worried. The monthly note on her house in the city of Markham, just outside Chicago, is approximately 100 percent of her meager monthly income. Broke and behind in her payments, Ms. Levey expects a foreclosure notice to show up any day, followed by a visit from “the sheriff, or whoever they send to tell you to get out of your own home.”

While the media coverage has focused on the high rollers who created the subprime frenzy (“If you can breathe, we’ll give you a loan”), the hapless victims have remained in the shadows, condemned to economic ruin.

After faithfully making mortgage payments for decades, Ms. Levey and her husband, Dan, were persuaded to take out a new loan, ostensibly for debt consolidation, in 2002. It was like plunging into quicksand. Dan was seriously ill at the time and he died two years later.

To this day Ms. Levey does not understand what she and her husband of more than half a century had agreed to. The terms might as well have been written in Sanskrit.

But she kept trying to meet her obligation. She exhausted her savings. She lost her car. She stopped buying clothes and cut back on food. But there was no way to keep up with the payments.

“I had to go to the state and tell them I was hungry,” she said.

I heard the same story again and again — decent people enticed, sometimes fraudulently, into loans they never understood and couldn’t afford.

For years redlining and other discriminatory practices served as roadblocks to homeownership in neighborhoods with significant numbers of poor and working-class residents, many of them black and brown. Making affordable loans available to such residents was important.

But we have since moved to the opposite extreme. Over the past several years mortgage lenders recognized that there were big bucks to be made in those neighborhoods, and they pounced.

They weren’t satisfied to offer reasonable loans at reasonable rates to customers who could handle them. They went far beyond that. They took advantage of a poorly regulated landscape to exploit unsophisticated home buyers and homeowners with mortgages and refinancing schemes that were all but guaranteed to result in a tragic explosion of foreclosures.

Thousands of poor people like Dorothy Levey, who worked for years to build modest amounts of equity in their homes, have been hammered — wiped out. The most unscrupulous of the mortgage lenders, and there were many of them, swooped in and sweet-talked their targets into signing contracts designed to squeeze them for everything they had in the world.

The fact that this is often legal doesn’t make it right. As insane as it sounds, Ms. Levey is still getting offers to refinance her mortgage.

There is some truth to the assertion that a lot of buyers signed up for deals they should have known they couldn’t afford. But it won’t do for the fat cats to fall back on empty phrases like “buyer beware.”

The subprime mortgage frenzy was a shameful, highly-charged phenomenon, motivated by greed and played out on a field of rampant exploitation. The victims deserved more protection than they got. As Paul Leonard, director of the California office of the Center for Responsible Lending, told me this week: “You shouldn’t have a marketplace that’s a ‘buyer beware’ marketplace for the most important financial transaction of most people’s lives.”

It’s not too much to ask that when Americans of modest means put their economic futures on the line, we have regulations in place to see that they are not ripped off.

If you think this is a small matter, consider that the center reported a year ago that subprime loans represented roughly a quarter of all home loans in the U.S., and that an estimated 2.2 million households in the subprime market would ultimately face foreclosure.

We ignored the subprime frenzy and its predictable consequences until it was too late. Now we are ignoring the plight of families caught in the tidal wave of foreclosures, and the long-term consequences that will flow from that.

There is a desperate need for government and corporate leaders to step in with a broad plan to modify existing loans and stave off foreclosure wherever possible. It is both the humane and the economically responsible thing to do.

Don’t hold your breath.
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Friday, November 23, 2007

"Rice Christians"

"Rice Christians"

["Rice Christian" was the pejorative term applied to desperate people who became Christians for the material benefits that were offered to them by the churches (or missionaries) who originated the term:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_Christian


I was personally turned off the church as a career following my divinity studies by the fact that the Protestant church mid 20th century looked to be being taken over by operations that promised financial benefits for joining up and which operated profitable schemes (often on the fringe of illegality) benefiting individuals in control and ready to exploit the benefits for religious organizations offered by U.S. tax system.

Taking financial advantage of a religious role is no new game. It has been around as long as religions have most likely. Jesus, himself, seems to have blown his cool only once -- at the religious tax collectors who blocked the doors of the Temple to the poor.

The modern danger to Americans in the use of religious need and greed as a motivation for membership in such institutions is that they discourage support systems for those not members of their organizations and oppose such things as taxes in the public interest. They would rather collect 10% for themselves than support taxes for state funded education, medical care, maintenance of infrastructures, food for the hungry, etc., etc. The upshot is that the U.S. is pouring billions into war games and starving children in the U.S. proper:

http://www.worldhunger.org/articles/04/editorials/hungry_us_children.htm

Only the U.S. of the developed nations steps aside from the basic needs of its own people. Others ponder this weird state of affairs in a nation that claims that almost all of its citizens are Christians. The short answer, of course, is that they are not Christians. They are increasingly members of the Megachurches dedicated to the greedy self-interest of their operators (see below). For the record private charities generally can handle only about 10% of publicly identifiable needs. Ed Kent]

..................

IN GOD'S NAME
Megachurches Add Local Economy to Their Mission
By DIANA B. HENRIQUES and ANDREW W. LEHREN
The business interests of megachurches include aviation
subsidiaries and investment partnerships.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/23/business/23megachurch.html?th&emc=th
--

"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Our Summer of 1955 Writing for Time Inc.

http://www.amazon.com/Historical-Present-Uses-Abuses-Past/dp/0878059857

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2006/03/15/opinion/opinion_20002744.php


Above are two links (I think the second is correct) of guys that I shared a summer with working at Time Inc. where we had been invited as the editors of our student papers to experience the range of Time's publications. The third of us has a common name such that I don't find a link on Google to track his subsequent activities. The three were Lou Kraar and Ed Yoder who were co-editors back in 1955-56 of the North Carolina Daily Tar Heel and Keith Johnson of the Cornell Sun. Each of the three went on to distinguished careers in journalism -- respectively starting at the Wall St. Journal, the leading North Carolina paper, and the old NY Herald Tribune. As the chair of the Yale Daily News, I alone did not pursue journalism, although it has always been an interesting field for me, but rather ended up (most happily) as a philosophy teacher. On retirement from that activity, I have recently returned to blogging.

Personally I was the odd man out of this distinguished group. I could do the job, but one of my stints that summer writing short stories of enterprise for Fortune Magazine introduced me to some warm and supportive guys who nevertheless made it clear -- with novels half finished in their bottom drawers -- that they were only sticking with the job to retain their substantial retirement benefits. Such made me think out what I would be doing for a lifetime. It could be a most exciting life, as Lou Kraar's seems to have been per the obituary notice on the website above. Or it could be dull and frustrating. As I watch various media types performing, I see the pattern that might have afflicted me. When reporters or commentators stray from their corporate party line to reporting things as they really are, they all too often get bumped out of their slots and reassigned to boring sidelines. One can be a prize winner and still suffer this fate. The media are not the sources of truth that they once were.

This is not to say that all journalism in the 20th century was benign. Time's slogan was "fair, not objective journalism." It was clear that Harry Luce in those days had his own version of reality, particularly relating to things Chinese -- he had been the child of China missionaries and would blue pencil any Time Inc. reports stemming from that source. The NY Times was doing "all the news that's fit to print," which may be a slogan stretched these days a bit with its departures into the worlds of gossip and bloody 'human interest' stuff.

My general observation, sadly enough, is that what is now filtering through to the American public is much edited with 'don't go there' directives which are threatening the very fabric of our democracy. We were manifestly tricked into buying the disastrous Iraq war by individuals determined to go there whatever the cost. One need not detail all the well known names of media folks who did not dig deep into the obvious distortions being put forth to justify 'shock and awe.'

I am writing now before dawn on a day that we should be giving thanks for the good things that have benefited us this past year. I fear that far too many people -- both here and over there under our guns -- have little or nothing for which to give thanks and one senses that many Americans are fearful about their futures.

May our media people begin to tell things as they really are? We need the truth unvarnished if we are to dig ourselves out of the hole into which our leaders have thrust us. Hopefully, even with much grief in store, we will truly have some things next year for which we can give thanks.

On a personal note, at my age one is almost reluctant to check out people one knew years ago -- was saddened to learn that Lou had recently died and had lived only a few blocks away from us in the Upper West Side of Manhattan -- we never met again and perhaps would not have recognized each other.

On another note, things have radically changed for women. Back in the 1950s at Time Inc. they were allowed to be researchers, but not writers. Two Radcliff grads had functioned as my 'big sister' researchers as I wrote the stories for Fortune. They would do the bulk of the work and I would write a finished version which either could have done just as well. Caroline Bird (Born Female), the mother of one of my wife's college roommates, was one of the few women journalists of that day. Her father had been the editor of a paper in Puerto Rico, which probably laid a basis for her entry into this mainly male domain.

Some things do get better for which we can give thanks today.
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

Collateral Damage?

Collateral Damage?

As child of WW2 I am constantly amazed and horrified to learn of practices being imposed on victims of our nation -- torture, covert rendering, bombing and rocketing civilians, secretive violations of basic Constitutional rights, aggressive territorial wars or the threat of same that resemble nothing more clearly than the attacks on neighboring states by Nazi Germany in its pursuit of dominance and loot.

"Collateral damage" is this era's euphemism for the killing and maiming of innocent peoples. Such we have been either doing or unleashing in massive numbers. How many thousands of Iraqis and Afghanis have been slaughtered since our intrusions into their countries were initiated post 9/11? How many more than our nearly 3,000 killed that day -- mainly by Saudis who whip and imprison rape victims?

The real collateral damage may have been self-inflicted upon the United States, itself, by our criminal leadership -- comparable to the damage done to Germany by its Nazis. There were many good Germans, stunned by the Nazi excesses, and there are many good Americans appalled by what our government has been doing. However, when it comes to collateral damage, we may find ourselves victims of the same pattern of collective punishment that we have been imposing on others. There is more than one way to bring down a brutal military regime. At its heart its economy is vulnerable to erosion both by its mad expenditure of its resources and the resentment that its brutalities against others engender. As the Euro and Yen and Pound replace the dollar, so we may be brought to an agonizing halt in our expeditions to 'shock and awe' others. Latin American looks now to be going its own way. The Asian nations may be next. And Europe is sitting comfortably on the sidelines watching the great United States progressively self-destruct.

Help!
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Why a "Jewish" State?

I have just posted items by Khalid Amayreh, a Palestinian, and Uri Avnery, an Israeli, suggesting that the demand that Palestinians recognize Israel as a "Jewish State" is a dodge to avoid real peace-making at Annapolis:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine

This looks to me to be a dangerous suggestion in another way. All states make mistakes, particularly with security, conflict, and war situations. To identify Israel as a "Jewish" state carries with it the hazard of identifying Jews generally with any errors or atrocities committed by Israel? I certainly would not want the U.S. to be so identified with any specific religion -- such identifications are anachronistic, dating back to the ancient world when nations were led to war by their g-ds. I hope that wiser heads such as Avneri's will prevail in this matter.

There is enough free floating anti-Semitism in the world without encouraging more of it!
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Saturday, November 17, 2007

Columbia Lynching West Harlem?

Columbia, as long as we have known it, has been a Janus figure -- ugly real estate practices driving out neighborhood residents and small businesses -- covered by its 'academic face'. Those of us who have experienced both know what an incredibly disparate mindset operates each. I gather faculty are now noting the decline and disappearance of the humanities that might otherwise soften Columbia's brutal side?

http://www.nysun.com/article/66314

Columbia now looks to be buying out the opposition to its Manhattanville expansion wherever it can -- it is hard to keep people off the plantation (to use the expression of J. Raymond Jones, the Harlem Fox, who years ago defended Harlem against comparable sell outs). The ducks now seem lined up -- most of the local pols except for Bill Perkins, the City Planning Commission headed by a rich white lady, a weakened community board -- ready perhaps, to accept a few scraps from the table?

Jane Jacobs would point out that the worst of things are once again happening in our neighborhoods. Interests with vague ego drives are doing their things. The 'icebox', the ugly building known as the Interchurch Center at 475 Riverside Drive, was supposed to become the Protestant Vatican -- it now houses most any other office effort that will pay the tab, as American Protestantism has been degenerating into the Billy Graham Anti-Intellectualism predicted by Reinhold Niebuhr.

And then there is the King -- not the one reversed as a civil rights leader, but the former Columbia trustee who converts not for profit lands into high priced money-makers. This King (not to be confused with Mark Kingdon) originally launched Columbia's moves towards Manhattanville and then moved on as trustee of the Cathedral to organize the sell off of its lands to high priced luxury real estate interests -- rentals planned at $6500.00 per month! This expansion is now placing huge pressures on nearby residents who are having to fight for their lives to forestall comparable rents which are being so raised in their neighborhood.

And what of Manhattanville -- those 17 acres in lower West Harlem to be devastated by years of construction seven stories deep? Do you really think Columbia can afford such development just to reconstruct the human brain? Far more likely the riverside park will become a drawing card along with the ready public transportation access for luxury housing which in turn will devastate wider area residents and businesses with super gentrification -- already in process in West Harlem where the real estate values are escalating.

I don't think Columbia has the wherewithal to carry out serious _academic_ expansion in that area. Thursday night's Columbia Alexander Hamilton fund-raising event tells the story -- $1.75 million with a dozen young girls from a Harlem dance company as entertainment for the assembled money sources? http://www.columbiaspectator.com/?q=node/28159 I strongly expect that down the line Columbia will fall back on the Cathedral model and use this high value turf at least in part for luxury items -- hotels, condos, whatever will sell or lease big along side an occasional Columbia academic structure -- the business school, perhaps?

Yes, Harlem is being lynched!
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Bollinger Allying With Bush Administration

[It is certainly a relief to see some Columbia faculty response to the administrative errors emerging from Low Library. I could not believe the introduction that Bollinger gave to Ahmadinejad whom one could see from other interviews that day (e.g. with Charlie Rose) was trying to back away from some of his extreme statements. Bollinger's assault on West Harlem and other faux pas with faculty and students may well spell an early demise to his presidency of Columbia. I fear as a Columbia degree holder that the university is once more running full speed ahead towards rough seas without competent ones at the helm. Ed Kent]


November 12, 2007 Edition > Section:


Faculty Group: Bollinger Allying With Bush Administration

BY ANNIE KARNI - Staff Reporter of the Sun
November 12, 2007
URL: http://www.nysun.com/article/66312



The president of Columbia University, Lee
Bollinger, is coming under attack from the campus
left, with 70 faculty members accusing him of
allowing outside interests to sway the school's
tenure decisions, and of aligning the university
with the Bush administration's war in Iraq.

In a statement signed by professors who say they
are troubled by a lack of autonomy at Columbia, a
group calling itself the Faculty Action Committee
accuses Mr. Bollinger of conflating his own
political views with those of the university. The
group also accuses Mr. Bollinger of failing to
issue a statement rejecting efforts by outsiders,
such as alumni, to influence tenure decisions.

"In the face of considerable efforts by outside
groups over the past few years to vilify members
of the faculty and determine how controversial
issues are taught on campus, the administration
has failed to make unequivocally clear that such
interventions will not be tolerated," the letter,
obtained yesterday by The New York Sun, reads.

RELATED: Text of the Faculty Group's Letter

The professors, many of whom signed a petition
two years ago calling on Columbia to divest from
companies that sell arms and military hardware to
Israel, plan to present the criticisms tomorrow
at a meeting of the Arts and Sciences faculty.

While the administration at Columbia has clashed
in the past with professors in the Middle East
and Asian Languages and Cultures department, the
movement against Mr. Bollinger has flared up
again over his conduct in hosting President
Ahmadinejad of Iran on campus in September.

Mr. Bollinger's harsh rebuke of the dictator, the
letter said, "sullied the reputation of the
University with its strident tone," and "allied
the University with the Bush administration's war
in Iraq." The group accuses Mr. Bollinger of
taking "partisan political positions concerning
the politics of the Middle East."

The letter also received support from faculty in
other departments, including History and
Architecture, who said they were reacting mainly
to Mr. Bollinger's rebuke of Mr. Ahmadinejad.

"You don't invite someone and then take him apart
in the introduction," a Pulitzer Prize-winning
poet who teaches at Columbia, Mark Strand, said
yesterday. "I don't understand it ethically, and
I don't understand what it accomplished — that
was my justification for signing the letter."

Some faculty members defending Mr. Bollinger said
they feared the signers were following in the
steps of the Arts and Sciences faculty at Harvard
University who last year forced their president,
Lawrence Summers, to resign by voting a lack of
confidence in him after he drew criticism for
comments about women's aptitude in science.

The faculty who signed the letter are:

Nadia Abu El-Haj, Lila Abu-Lughod, Qais
Al-Awqati, Paul Anderer, Mark Anderson, Gil
Anidjar, Zainab Bahrani, Akeel Bilgrami, Richard
Billows, Elizabeth Blackmar, Partha Chatterjee,
Lewis Cole, Jonathan Cole, Elaine
Combs-Schilling, Susan Crane, Jonathan Crary,
Julie Crawford, Hamid Dabashi, Patricia Dailey,
Tom DiPrete, Brent Edwards, Eric Foner, Aaron
Fox, Katherine Franke, Victoria de Grazia, Page
Fortuna, Steven Gregory, William Harris, Andreas
Huyssen, Rashid Khalidi, Alice Kessler-Harris,
Marilyn Ivy, Brian Larkin, Lydia Liu, Sylvère
Lotringer, Mahmood Mamdani, Peter Marcuse,
Reinhold Martin, Mark Mazower, Mary McLeod,
Brinkley Messick, Rosalind Morris, Keith Moxey,
Frances Negron-Muntaner, Mae Ngai, Bob O'Meally,
Neni Panourgia, John Pemberton, Richard Peña,
Julie Peters, Pablo Piccato, Sheldon Pollock,
Elizabeth Povinelli, Wayne Proudfoot, Bruce
Robbins, David Rosner, George Saliba, James
Schamus, David Scott, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak,
Mark Strand, Paul Strohm, Michael Taussig, Ezra
Tawil, Kendall Thomas, Nadia Urbinati, Marc van
de Mieroop, Karen van Dyck, Dorothea von Mücke,
Gauri Viswanathan, Gwendolyn Wright.

November 12, 2007 Edition > Section:
New York>
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Columbia's Faculty Protest

[I had been startled by the general silence of Columbia faculty until a distinguished group yesterday expressed its distress with administrative actions without faculty consultation -- former Provost Jonathan Cole, Eric Foner, Peter Marcuse, and others. I know from my own personal experience teaching in both private and public universities that pressures are greater on faculty in the former to conform to administrative dictates. One of my own undergraduate teachers, John Silber, was notorious for manipulating faculty salaries at Boston University when he became president there.

I hope more faculty will speak out their concerns of conscience and not simply leave the distress to students at Columbia. Sidney Morgenbesser, among my own teachers at Columbia, did so even though the consequence was a blow to the head from a police club as he engaged in protecting students from same in 1968. Certainly there are as many if not more issues on the table now -- of corporate greed, governmental corruption and violations of our Constitution, and wars launched for personal profit -- that should be mobilizing us against the crimes of our government. Ed Kent]

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Protecting Professors
By Editorial Board [Columbia Spectator]
PUBLISHED NOVEMBER 15, 2007

On Tuesday, the New York Sun published an op-ed by the Columbia University Faculty Action Committee arguing that the academic environment at Columbia is too constricted and that faculty are largely unrepresented in the formation of University policy. At the forefront of the coalition's concerns is the tenure process, which they believe fails to encourage a free exchange of challenging ideas due to lobbying and political pressure from outside the University. It is detrimental to the academic life of Columbia if professors do not feel fully empowered by the administration to express their views, especially when they come under assault from external influences. The University must reaffirm that while the marketplace of ideas may expose professors to criticism, the intrusion of non-academic pressure on the tenure process is unacceptable.

Each tenure candidate must be reviewed by his or her department; the Tenure Process Review Committee, comprised of faculty from across the University; and, finally, President Lee C. Bollinger. But while many decisions occur quietly, recent tenure reviews for professors such as Nadia Abu El-Haj have been marked by public pressure from individuals and groups outside the academic community. The tenure process is intended to be confidential to ensure that the Committee's decisions focus on the scholarly value, rather than the political implications, of his or her work.

True academic freedom must allow for the pursuit of ideas that challenge past research and further the discourse within a particular field. While a professor's work is always open to public scrutiny, untenured professors or professors up for review should be able to face such criticism without the fear that it will unduly affect the tenure process. Faculty members, both tenured and untenured, should feel protected by the University and assured that the tenure process will be thorough but fair. It is essential that administrators make clear publicly that faculty review cannot—and will not—be hijacked by those with purely political motives.

President Bollinger has said repeatedly that he values academic freedom, and he showed that he was above external pressure in his initial invitation of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Such actions are hollow, however, if faculty members do not feel that they have the ability to be as controversial in their academic pursuits. The Sun article amounts to a partial vote of no confidence in the administration and cannot be ignored. The tenure review of Joseph Massad has already been met with significant protest and outside attacks. Whatever the outcome, this will be a good opportunity for Bollinger and other administrators to make clear that Columbia values academic freedom on all levels.
TAGS: Columbia University Faculty Action Committee, Joseph Massad, Nadia Abu El-Haj, Tenure Review
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Friday, November 09, 2007

Despicable Slanders of Eurpean Health Systems

[My family has experienced both British and Italian medicine during study and work times over there and knows full well as any who is honest in comparison that one is more likely to get better health coverage there at a lower cost. We have personally been most fortunate in NYC as a family, but know of too many horror stories here. Dave Rogers, University Professor at Cornell and head of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation as well as dean of two medical schools along the way in his career despised the older AMA and other medical vested interests that so savaged our medical system and left it wounded in comparison with our competitors in Europe and elsewhere. Lying by the vested right wing interests is the name of the attack game against universal and affordable medical care here. Ed Kent]

.......................

OP-ED COLUMNIST
Health Care Excuses
By PAUL KRUGMAN
The reality is that the best foreign health care systems do
as well or better than the U.S. system, while costing far
less money.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/09/opinion/09krugman.html?th&emc=th

--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Torture? Never Again!

Torture has been around, of course, as long as humans have had the capacity to abuse each other. It was done for public entertainment by the ancients -- the Roman games to the death in the Coliseum echoed by our more violent professional sports.

Christians and others during the darker ages felt compelled to justify torture in the name of G-d which they did as a conversion tactic or punishment for 'heresies' from the true faith -- their version of it, that is. The Catholics burned Protestants at the stake and Calvin was implicated in the burning of at least one young Catholic priest. Thousands of (mainly elderly women) were burned in Europe as witches beginning roughly in the 17th century and extending into New England. 'Water boarding' was a part of the witch trial game. If an alleged witch survived the ducking stool, she was manifestly a witch to be finished off by fire. It she drowned -- tough luck -- got it wrong on that one.

Jumping to the modern era, the Axis powers during WW2 tortured with gay abandon. The Nazis particularly seem to have gotten their jollies out of torture and mass murder. We always have our psychopaths among us waiting to be unleashed. Your boss or spouse may be one.

With the horrors of WW2's brutalities before our eyes, the civilized nations took legal action to ban forever the possibility of mass murder and torture. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 specified a long list of protections -- some of which could be suspended in the face of emergencies ("Loose lips sink ships" was a well remembered slogan from WW2.). However, two human rights were designated "nonderogable" meaning no exceptions for any reason. They were slavery and torture.

I first encountered the modern defense of torture when an argument (now widely used) was put forward by a colleague with whom I had taught at CCNY where I did the philosophy of law courses during the uproar year in 1968-69. Michael Levin, a philosophy department member, did a short piece arguing that torture would be justified to uncover the location of a nuclear weapon set to explode in a city:

http://people.brandeis.edu/~teuber/torture.html

Frankly, I did not like Mike personally. He struck me as a hostile person and when I had a choice of CUNY departments into which to settle, I avoided CCNY and went to Brooklyn College despite the much longer subway trip to and from. However, I later defended Mike's tenure when it was being threatened along with that of Leonard Jeffries -- both on charges of alleged racist statements that they had made. I had been a member of an ACLU advisory committee and worked through Norman Siegel, speaking to the various CCNY committee members investigating Jeffries and Levin and the CCNY president finally called me to assure me that Mike's tenure was secure. I gather that he said the experience made a civil libertarian of him.

However, let us be entirely clear that Levin's argument does two despicable things:

1) It defends one of humanity's more egregious practices -- cruelty sanctioned by political authority. This practice in turn when justified as Mike did it,

2) opens the door wide to extensive human rights violations. Philosophers know this as the thin edge of the wedge situation. Allow one instance of a travesty and the doors may slide further open to permit widespread abuses.

It should be no surprise that our gulag abuses of Muslims in such places as Brooklyn just after 9/11 would proliferate to Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, overseas renderings, and now to senseless killings of civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq by such as the Blackwater hoods.

Torture is a violation of the American Constitution. I regret that we shall have yet another Attorney General who seems oblivious to this reality.

Shame, America! This is what we fought against in WW2 -- and promised the world never again!!!!!
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Thursday, November 08, 2007

Selling Out to the Devil, Himself?

[The last news item that I recall on Pat Robertson was his recommendation that we assassinate Hugo Chavez, which I assume got more play in Latin America than here in the U.S. These characters seem hungry for publicity, whatever it takes. And according to recent investigations of six right wing evangelical operations, it brings in big money and lavish living as well. This Senate investigation was initiated by Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa:

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/novemberweb-only/145-22.0.html


One of the dirty little secrets about our economic system is that crooks can steal the bank in the name of religion -- and many do. All they have to do is to sell out to the highest bidder -- and who is to say that he will not be the devil himself? I did a degree in theology before going on in philosophy and so discovered some of these crooks at it early on. One summer I worked for what was then called the Protestant Council of the City of New York. It was a scam operation bent on collecting monies, run by an Albany, NY slum landlord -- murdered by a tenant a few years ago. My job was to update its directory of a thousand area churches. I discovered that many of them shared phone numbers with local bars and many were obviously crooked operations. When I tried to report this abomination, I was stiffed by religious authorities who knew of what I had discovered, but did not want to get involved. Eventually this particular crooked operation was reformed, but many out there are on the make today.

In the present instance on wonders what many times divorced Giuliani -- whose former police commissioner and business partner faces the vote of a grand jury today -- has to do with evangelical religion? Ed Kent]

.........................

In a Surprise, Pat Robertson Backs Giuliani
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK and MICHAEL COOPER
The endorsement exemplified the Christian conservative
movement's divide over balancing politics and principle.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/08/us/politics/08repubs.html?th&emc=th

--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Anthony Lewis Reviews Books on Bush Presidency

[Anthony Lewis more or less nails the obscenities of the presidency that we are experiencing. May it not do even more drastic damage to our nation in the months to come. Ed Kent]

...................................

Books on the Bush Presidency
Reviewed by ANTHONY LEWIS
Robert Draper tell readers that George W. Bush knows he's
right; Jack Goldsmith explains how Alberto Gonzales and
John Yoo made sure he got his way.

Review:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/books/review/Lewis3-t.html?8bu&emc=bu
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Saturday, November 03, 2007

New evidence suggests Rudolph W. Giuliani overlooked . . .

[Below are two quotes taken from the article detailing Rudy Giuliani's tendency to associate with and promote crooks -- even to the highest positions in the nation.

Those of us who experienced him as our mayor became increasingly disenchanted as time wore on. He was manifestly a bully. His vaunted record as a Federal Prosecutor had many holes -- suits messed up against major crime figures. He was, himself, promoting guys that looked both unqualified and crooked to key posts as the article below indicates. His treatment of his own family was appalling -- announcing his new girl friend and plan to divorce to the media rather than to his family -- his children want to have nothing to do with him. He messed up NYC security prior to 9/11 -- placing his emergency headquarters at ground zero which had been threatened and attacked a few years earlier. He then strode around the city making big while allowing the workers on the pile to put their lives at risk. One of them with lung damage showed me the threatening letter they had all received from him -- one sentence of thanks with a page and a half of legal threats should they try to benefit from their situation (word of their lung damage must have been getting out -- the pile was smoldering out poisons for months as they tried to clear it -- many were cheated out of pay).

Watch the Rudy story emerge -- there is a tale to be told and, I assume it will be in good time. The mob planned to assassinate him, he claims, and then changed it mind? Interesting. Ed Kent}

................................

“I wonder if he noticed how much becoming part of his team resembled becoming part of a mafia family,” Mr. Kerik wrote. “I was being made.”

“Rudy can fall for people big time, and sometimes qualifications are secondary to loyalty,” said Fran Reiter, a former Giuliani deputy mayor who now supports Hillary Clinton. “If he gets it in his head he trusts you, he is extremely loyal.”

THE LONG RUN
Loyal to Kerik, Giuliani Missed Warning Signs
By MICHAEL POWELL
New evidence suggests Rudolph W. Giuliani overlooked
disturbing information as he supported Bernard B. Kerik.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/03/us/politics/03kerik.html?th&emc=th
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

"Kill the Communist!"

I don't think I have ever seen Bill Buckley looking more discomforted than when he was sitting on the podium along with one of the proverbial ladies in white tennis shoes, a retired general, and assorted others in Madison Square Garden at the One Million Americans for McCarthy rally back in 1955. Eisenhower had finally blown his cool when McCarthy had attacked a young staffer in his administration with the red baiting smear charge that the Republicans in Congress had been chorusing with great glee. The nader was Bessie Smith, 'notorious communist' discovered working in the State Department -- wrong Bessie Smith. This one did the cleaning nights.

Back to the rally -- the low point was when Lisa Larson, noted Life Magazine photographer, was grabbed by cops and dragged -- not out the obvious exit door at the rear, but down past the podium with the crowd screaming "Kill the Communist." Lisa, needless to say, was a noted photog, not a pol of any kind.

My wife to be and I were there as student editors, she of her student paper at Sarah Lawrence College, and me of the Yale Daily News. After the Larson incident when Lyn and I were standing by the side wall bleachers, some idiot struck up the cry again directed at her, "She's a communist!" I quickly steered her away to the far side of the podium and the screaming died down.

Later we both went home to our colleges and wrote graphic accounts of what we had seen. Mine produced a scalding letter to the Yalie Daily by Buckley -- as usual using his notorious big words vocabulary for his insults -- pretty good for the son of a Texas oil man educated in part in Franco's Spain where the family summered -- never could figure the British accent, though -- maybe his nanny?

Buckley in those days -- the late 1950s -- haunted Yale trying to pick off bright young students to enlist in his armies of the right. Yes, I was invited and declined the ceremony of walking down the long hall in the Greenwich family home with its portraits with purple backgrounds of the family patriarchs, so they told me. But Buckley did hook many a one and so the right wing think tanks got launched -- with a little help from inheritors of billions such as Richard Mellon Scaife who funds a number of them.

I hear that there may be as many as 300 of these outfits -- you will see Bush and Cheney addressing them and one of them produced the "surge" doctrine (Kagan of the American Enterprise Institute) that displaced the recommendations of all others on how to plan a viable future for Iraq:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig7/greenwald6.html

I won't try to run through the entire list of these outfits with their jazzy titles: Heritage Foundation, Cato Institute, Manhattan Institute, etc., etc. However, what runs in common with them is lying writ large. And these lies are perpetuated by both the media and the Republican pols who pick up and promote their daily feed ins. A good example was put forth yesterday by Paul Krugman of Giuliani grabbing a stat out of one of their reports that made it look as though British Medicine ("socialized enemy that keeps Bush vetoing medical insurance coverage for kids) is only half as effective in treating prostate cancer (Giuliani's) as American practice. This is a damned lie. The two systems are equally effective -- if one is so lucky to get adequate and timely treatment here in the states which many do not because they do not have insurance coverage:


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/02/opinion/02krugman.html?em&ex=1194235200&en=53c6be1c4117adba&ei=5087%0A

To quote Krugman in part:

"Mr. Giuliani got his numbers from a recent article in City Journal, a publication of the conservative Manhattan Institute. The author gave no source for his numbers on five-year survival rates — the probability that someone diagnosed with prostate cancer would still be alive five years after the diagnosis. And they’re just wrong."

What we are seeing here is an extension of the Nazi tactic which I remember all too well from my childhood. It was called the "Big Lie." The Nazis promulgated all sorts of misinformation to deceive people as to what they were up to and who were the real villains -- in fact they and not their millions of victims.

What we are bombarded with here by the right wingers is a multitude of little lies almost daily. One needs the time to check out virtually everything that the media put forth. I happily have some of that in retirement. I can say how contemptuous I find intentional lying to be -- and not just because I was trained as a philosopher to pursue the truth.

I could go on with recollections running down the years of the right wing deception games. Buckley's years in Spain under Franco's regime obviously tainted him with the fascist outlook of that poor nation in those days. And he has passed it along to the extremists here dating from his first major attack book, God and Man at Yale, in which his target was our most beloved Chaplain, Sidney Lovett, who had been jailed as a pacifist during WW1: http://www.bartleby.com/63/97/4197.html

Those reading here have a choice to make between setting out to kill our imaged up enemies -- Iranians, Muslims loosely identified? -- or peacemaking while we still have time.
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Friday, November 02, 2007

"No Irish Need Apply"!

Such was the tag end of a typical job ad in the early 20th century. Each arrival group once established seems to produce spokespersons compelled to keep out newer immigrant groups.

I experienced such worlds of prejudice and watched them being gradually dissipated during the second half of the 20th century. When I started school (as a WASP) in Farmington, Connecticut, the disfavored were mainly the Irish and Italians who attended the local Catholic Church located as they were west of Main St. and towards the river which tended to flood now and again. The WASPs lived up hill east of Main St. or in comfortable homes in the country side beyond the local golf course and country club (closed membership) to the north. A few were still pre-Revolutionary War land grant families. Polish Americans farmed out on the flood plains to the west where a major flood from a dam break wiped out much of their working people's town (Unionville) and threatened their farms. They also lived in another working people's city, New Britain, off to south west of Hartford, Connecticut, which, itself, had a small African American ghetto embedded in it from which ladies would commute out to household work -- men were not generally welcomed for jobs.

To the north where we spent summers in the North East Kingdom (of Vermont) I encountered further prejudices against "French Canadians" (so called even though Americans) and native Americans. One of the latter was a playmate -- actually only his mother was fully native American -- and he taught me such things as how to chop off the head of a chicken being prepared for dinner. His sister was the first girl who kissed me one sunny afternoon sitting in our hammock when we were about 5 or six -- her mother read romance magazines. One unforgettable afternoon an ancient native American man came by in his birch bark canoe, selling handicrafts. He kindly showed me how to jump into his canoe, being sure to step only on the ribs so as not to harm the bark. That started me out with canoe savvy and I eventually taught others how to do it right at a summer camp. Canoes, if one knows how to handle them, are the safest small boat in rough weather on a lake -- one must kneel low on the bottom and then it will ride the waves securely.

One of the positive things of those days was that we were not all locked into class structures that kept us from working with and getting to know other people and their ways of life -- this was an American option not open to the Brits, I discovered, while studying and working there during several years of studies both in my teens and later at Oxford.

Perhaps the period just after WW2 was unique as an opening up for us college students particularly. The returning GI Bill veterans wore khakis -- cast castoffs from their uniforms -- and so we wore them, too. They had often come from working class backgrounds and we as students tended to seek challenging physical jobs during our summers -- a sort of macho thing in those days. Where did you work this summer? Did a trip around the world on a tramp steamer. Worked in the oil fields -- will never do that again, it nearly killed me.

Personally my job range with friends from the Ivies and other colleges was extensive. We worked one summer in construction building homes for factory working families in New Britain. My co-workers were mainly new immigrants from Poland, learning English. I got to run a power saw clearing timber for he houses -- would prevail with my Polish boss to save some around the edges for shade trees. Drove the dump truck, did the ditching around the foundations, put up insulating, carpentering and painting stuff. Very little I did not learn about construction -- except my boss wavered about letting me run the bulldozer which I would have much enjoyed. Worked for a blaster for several weeks, too, laying in trenches to drain a marsh.

Shifting years I took on double jobs one summer -- working in New England's largest scrap metal operation days and in an aircraft plant nights. Those were the days when one had unlimited energy. The first job with Suisman and Blumenthal was particularly interesting in that they gave the only decent jobs to African American men in the Hartford area -- and sent some off the college (They gave me a grant at the end of the summer to help with my Oxford theological studies). Thus, I first got to work with people of color -- there was still a great distance from African Americans who would eat separately from me and my friends, including a new arrival from the Caribbean.

At the factory job I met traveling workers from all over -- a number from Texas for some reason. They would tell me tales of their oil exploration jobs -- one foreman who was giving them a rough time who turned up in a ditch with a knife in his back and no one had seen a thing. I brushed that off as tall talk until a big guy came at me and accused me of eyeing his wife -- there was a small women contingent somewhere in the factory. I thought he was going to turn me into mince meat when suddenly he backed off and left. As I turned around I saw my buddies putting their switch blades back in their pockets.

Back to my subject heading above, I find the Republican candidates exploiting anti Latin American prejudices disgusting. We automatically turn off Lou Dobbs who is one of the most racist commentators to beam out of our TV screens these days. Looks like he figured a way to tap the embedded racism out there with a smile and support of his sponsors and management -- anything to boost the ratings. Someone should remind him that the Klan was running high in the mid 1920s before it went bust. And while we are at it Klan comes from 'clan' which comes from poor Scots who migrated to the South in this country and put up walls against their competitors -- Jews, Catholics, and African Americans whom they took great pleasure in murdering in horrendous ways. Lest we forget, torture is nothing new to this country -- burning and maiming were widely practiced less than a century back. There were picture postcards made of these brutalities that one could purchase in one's local drug store. Some readers here probably have some buried in an attic somewhere. A NYC museum did an exhibit of hundreds of them a few years back -- happy people with their little kids on their shoulders smirking over tormented maimed bodies -- African Americans -- and new immigrant Catholics and Jews!!!

Lest we forget and begin to repeat our past horrors!
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net

Thursday, November 01, 2007

Will Mosul Dam Failure Destroy Iraqi City?

[I recall a dam failure on the Farmington River in Connecticut where I lived as a child that wiped out half a town -- Unionville -- and did massive damage with the sweep of its waters. Such things often occur with little advanced warning and it sounds as though this could be a real disaster. Ed Kent]

....................................

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/278B5A68-4C02-4AAC-A864-63800596B638.htm

Mosul dam in danger of collapse


Iraq's largest dam is in danger of collapsing and killing tens of thousands of people in a massive flood, according to a US report.

The US inspector for Iraq reconstruction on Tuesday said a $27m US project had not improved the Mosul Dam on the Tigris river in northern Iraq, which could buckle under water pressure and let loose a 20-metre wave.

The report from Stuart Bowen, the special inspector-general for Iraqi construction, cited assessments by the US army corps of engineers, which called the current probability of dam failure "exceptionally high".

His report also included a letter to Nuri al-Maliki, Iraq's prime minister, from the US ambassador to Iraq and the chief US military commander, which said: "A catastrophic failure of the Mosul Dam would result in flooding along the Tigris river all the way to Baghdad."



The dam was completed in 1984, but it was built on soluble soils that move and create cavities under the dam and its banks. Those cavities must be grouted to prevent collapsing.



The US and the Iraqi government started work to improve the dam in 2005.



'Fraud'



"There is no danger, and in the case of this dam, the government, through the Ministry of Water Resources in collaboration with experts, is tackling the problems"

Ali al-Dabbagh, Iraq government spokesman
The US government provided funds for short-term solutions to the dam's problems while an Iraqi ministry was responsible for implementing a long-term solution.


Twenty-one contracts worth $27m were awarded by the US government to provide the Iraqi administration with needed replacement and spare parts for grouting operations, assistance with the grouting programme and enhanced grouting to augment Iraq's efforts.

Among other things, the US contracts were supposed to provide for five grout-mixing vehicles, Bowen said. One mixer was built, two were partially built and two were not built.

"Our inspection turned up evidence of potential fraud," he told a congressional panel. That has been referred to his investigative department, Bowen said.

Ali al-Dabbagh, an Iraq government spokesman, played down the report, saying it was old. He said all dams undergo annual repairs, but the Mosul Dam was monitored 24-hours a day and had 25 teams doing grouting work on the foundations.

"There is no danger. And in the case of this dam, the government, through the Ministry of Water Resources in collaboration with experts, is tackling the problems," he said on Iraqi television.
Source: Agencies
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
--
Ed Kent 212-665-8535 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net